Keskkonnaõigus

Ava otsing
Otsige

BIBLIOGRAAFIA

1. Aedmaa, A. jt. Haldusmenetluse käsiraamat. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli kirjastus 2004.
2. Alder, J. Access to the Courts: A Conflict of Ideologies. – Journal of Environmental Law 1998/10, nr 1.
3. Alexy, R. Kollisioon ja kaalumine kui põhiõiguste dogmaatika põhiprobleemid. – Juridica 2001, nr 1.
4. Andersen, S., Sarma, S. Protecting the Ozone Layer: the United Nations History. London: Earthscan Press 2002.
5. Anttila, P., Ojanen, M., Puhakka, M., Vourisuo, T., Frey, T. Globaalsed keskkonnaprobleemid. Tartu 1996.
6. Arajärvi, N. The Changing Nature of Customary International Law. London: Routledge 2014.
7. Armstrong, S., Botzler, R. (toim). Environmental Ethics: Divergence and Convergence. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc 1993.
8. Ayres, R., Simonis, U. Industrial Metabolism. Restructuring for Sustainable Development, Tokyo: UN University Press 1994.
9. Baarschers, W. Eco-fact and Eco-fiction: Understanding the Environmental Debate. London: Routledge 1996.
10. Bailey, S., Farrell, G., Mattei, U. Protecting future generations through commons. Trends in social cohesion, No. 26. Council of Europe 2013 sine loco.
11. Barnes, J. (toim). The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation Vol 2. Bollingen series LXXI 2. Princenton: Princenton University 1995.
12. Bell, S., McGillivray, D., Pedersen, O. W. Environmental Law. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
13. Bodansky, D., Brunee, J., Hey, E. (toim). The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
14. Boyd, D. R. The Environmental Rights Revolution: A Global Study of Constitutions, Human Rights, and the Environment. Vancouver: UBC Press 2012.
15. Brown, J. Understanding International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
16. C ameron, J. The Status of Precautionary Principle in International Law. – O´Riordan, T., Cameron, J. (toim). Interpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Earthscan 1994.
17. Cameron, J., Abouchar, J. The Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law. – Freestone, D., Hey E. (toim). The Precautionary Principle and International Law. The Challenge of Implementation. New York: Kluwer Law International 1996.
18. Carson, R. Hääletu kevad. Tallinn: Valgus 1968.
19. Chadwick, R. F. (peatoim). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. London: Academic Press 1998.
20. Chapman, J. L., Reiss, M. J. Ecology: Principles and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.
21. Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Summary for Policymakers. An Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, p 5–7. Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
22. Coenen, F. H. J. M. (toim). Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions: The Promise and Limits of Participatory Processes for the Quality of Environmentally Related Decision-making. Springer: 2008 sine loco.
23. Colby, K. T. Public Access to Private Land – Allemansrätt in Sweden. – Landscape and Urban Planning 1988, No 15.
24. Cross, F. Paradoxical Perils of the Precautionary Principle. – Washington and Lee Law Journal 1996, Vol 53, No 3.
25. Dam, S., Tewary, V. Polluting environment, polluting constitution: is a ’polluted’ constitution worse than a polluted environment? – Journal of Environmental Law 2005, Vol 17, No 3.
26. Darpö, J. Effective Justice? Synthesis report of the study on the Implementation of Articles 9.3 and 9.4 of the Aarhus Convention in the Member States of the European Union (11.10.2013). Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
27. Desai, B. H. Forests, International Protection. Max-Planck Institute for Comparative Public and International Law 2011. Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
28. De-Shalit, A. Why Posterity Matters. Environmental policies and future generations. London: Routledge 1995.
29. Ebbesson, J. The Notion of Public Participation in International Environmental Law. – Yearbook of International Environmental Law 1997, Vol 8. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1998.
30. Eesti keskkonnaseire 2013. Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
31. Epiney, A. Environmental Principles. – Macrory, R. (toim). Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law. A High Level of Protection? Groningen: Europa Law Publishing 2006.
32. Epiney, A. Division of Competence between Member States and the EC. – Jans, J. J. (toim). The European Convention and the Future of European Environmental Law. Groningen: Europe law Publishing 2003.
33. European Commission – DG Environment. Development of Guidance on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). Final Report 2014.
34. Ferrey, S. Environmental Law. Examples & Explanations. 6. ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer 2013.
35. Final Report of the Committee on Formation of Customary International Law. Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
36. Fisher, E., Lange, B., Scotford, E. Environmental Law. Text, Cases and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
37. Fitzmaurice, M., Ong, D. M., Merkouris. P. (toim). Research handbook on international environmental law. Northampton: Edward Elgar 2010.
38. Fotopoulos, T. The Multidimentional Crisis and Inclusive Democracy. – The International Journal of Inclusive democracy 2007, Vol 3, No 2.
39. Fracchia, F. The Legal Definition of Environment: From Rights to Duties. – Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper No 06–09, 2005.
40. Gainest, P. The Polluter-Pays Principle: From Economic Equity to Environmental Ethos. – Texas International Law Journal 1991, No 26.
41. Gottlieb, R. Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement. New York 2005.
42. Grabbe, M. Measurement Uncertainties in Science and Technology. Springer 2005.
43. Gruen, L. Ethics and Animals. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011.
44. Guerry, A. Icarus and Daedalus: conceptual and tactical lessons for marine ecosystem-based management. – Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2005, No 3.
45. Hohman, H. Precautionary Legal Duties and Principle of Modern International Environmental Law – The Precautionary Principle: International Environmental Law Between Exploitation and Protection. Graham and Trotman / Martinus Nijhoff 1994.
46. Holder, J. Environmental Assessment. The Regulation of Decision Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004.
47. IAP2 International Federation. IAP2’s Public Particiapation Spectrum. 2014. Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
48. Jahney, S., Bennet, S. Recovery from the most profound mass extinction of all time – Proceedings of the Royal Biological Society 2008, Vol 275.
49. Jans, J. European Environmental Law. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing 2000.
50. Jans, J., Wedder, H. European Environmental Law: After Lisbon. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing 2012.
51. Jarass, H.D. Saksa immissioonikaitseõiguse põhistruktuurid. – Juridica 2007, nr 7.
52. Jäätma, J. Ohutõrjeõigus politsei- ja korrakaitseõiguses: kooskõla põhiseadusega. Doktoritöö. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 2015.
53. Kanger, L. TalveAkadeemia. Kas EV põhiseaduses sisaldub õigus puhtale keskkonnale? – Akadeemia 2007, nr 11.
54. Kask, O. jt. Keskkonnaseadustiku üldosa seaduse kommentaarid: 2., täiendatud väljaanne. SA Keskkonnaõiguse Keskus 2015. Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
55. Kelemen, R. D. Globalising EU Environmental regulation. – Conference on Europe and the Management of Globalisation. Princeton University 2007, lk 1.
56.Keskkonna ja Arengu Maailmakomisjoni 1987. a tegevusraport “Meie ühine tulevik” (nn Brundtlandi raport), punkt 27. Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
57. Keskkonnaõiguse Keskus. Oska osaleda! Juhend olulistes otsustusprotsessides osalemiseks. SA Keskkonnaõiguse Keskus 2013. – Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
58. Kiss, A., Shelton, D. Manual of European Environmental Law. Cambridge: Grotius Publications Ltd 1993.
59. Kiss, A., Shelton, D. Manual of European Environmental Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.
60. Kravchenko, S., Bonine, J. E. Interpretation of Human Rights for the Protection of the Environment in the European Court of Human Rights. – Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal 2012, No 25, Issue 1.
61. Kraemer, L. European Environmental Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2003.
62. Kraemer, L. EC Environmental Law. 6th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2007.
63. Kärner, M. Mõned korrakaitseseadusega kaasnenud muudatused kriminaalmenetluses: järelevalve- ja süüteomenetluse piiritlemisprobleem. – Juridica 2014, nr 6.
64. Laaring, M. Eesti korrakaitseõigus ohuennetusõigusena. Doktoritöö. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 2015.
65. Ladyman, J., Lambert, J., Wiesner, K. What is a Complex System? –  European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2013, No 3.
66. Larchan, B., Brennan, B. The Common Heritage of Mankind Principle in International Law. – Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 1982–1983, No 3.
67. Larsson, M-L. The Law of Environmental Damage. Liability and Reparation. Kluwer Law International & Norsteds Juridik 1999.
68. Lawrence, D. et al. New Controls on the Deliberate Release of GMOs. – European Environmental Law Review 2002.
69. Lodzina, I., Schneider, G. Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity at National Level: Institutional and Legal Aspects. – Workshop on the Practical Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity in the Baltic Countries. 16–18 October 1994, Tallinn 1994.
70. Lopman, E., Nymann, T.Keskkonnavastutusest keskkonnavastutuse seaduse valguses. – Riigikogu Toimetised 2007, nr 16.
71. Lyotard, J.F. The Post Modern Conditions. A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis 1984.
72. Lyster, S. International Wildlife Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994.
73. Madise, Ü. jt. Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadus. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. Kolmas, täiendatud väljaanne. Tallinn: Juura 2012.
74. Malcolm, R. A. Guidebook to Environmental Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell 1994.
75. Marceau, J. The Precautionary Principle under WTO Law. – Precaution from Rio to Johannesburg: Proceedings of the Geneva Environmental Network Roundtable. Geneva 2002.
76. Matsuura, H. Does the Constitutional Right to Health Matter? A Review of Current Evidence – CESifo DICE Report 2/2014 (June). Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
77. Maurer, M. Haldusõigus. Üldosa. Tallinn: Juura 2004.
78. McAdam, J. Climate Change, Forced Migration, and International Law. Oxford:Oxford University Press 2012.
79. McIntosh, R. The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1985.
80. McIntyre, O., Mosedale, T. The Precautionary Principle as a Norm of Customary International Law. – Journal of Environmental Law (Oxford) 1997, Vol 9, No 2.
81. Mendelson, M. The Formation of Customary International Law. – Hague Academy of International Law, Collected Courses 1998.
82. Metsa majandamise piirangud: õiguslik analüüs. Tartu: SA Keskkonnaõiguse keskus. 2013.
83. Montini, M. The EC External Competence and the Protection of the Environment. Jans, J. H. (toim). The European Convention and the Future of European Environmental Law. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing 2003.
84. Moore, V. A Practical Approach to Planning Law. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
85. Neumeyer, K. International Administrative Law (Internationales Verwaltungsrecht). München 1922.
86. OECD – Recommendation of the Council on Principles concerning Transfrontier Pollution. 14 November 1974 – C(74)224.
87. OECD. Extended Producer Responsibility: A Guidance Manual for Governments. 2001.
88. Oiwa, K. Rowing the Eternal Sea: The Story of a Minamata Fisherman. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2001.
89. Pae, T. Mis on Eesti kõrgeim tehismägi? – Eesti Loodus 2005, nr 5.
90. Pape, K., Schillhorn, K. Environmental Law in the Federal Republic of Germany.Koeman, N. (toim). Environmental Law in Europe. Kluwer Law International 1999.
91. Perchal, S. Directives in EC law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.
92. Pilving, I. Keskkonnakasutuse kava kui halduse tegevusvorm. – Juridica 2010, nr 1.
93. Pilving, I. Haldusakti siduvus. Uurimus kehtiva haldusakti õiguslikust tähendusest rõhuasetusega avalik-õiguslikel lubadel. Doktoritöö. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 2006.
94. Plater, D. From the Beginning, a Fundamental Shift of Paradigms: a Theory and Short History of Environmental Law. – Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 1993–1994, No 27.
95. Rajamani, J. The Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility and the Balance of Commitments under the Climate Regime. – Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 2000, Vol 9, Issue 2.
96. Ratas, R. Estonian environmental protection: situation and legislation. – North European Environmental Law 1995, lk 153–155.
97. Rehbinder, E. The Precautionary Principle in an Environmental Perspective. – Miljorettens grundsporgsmal 1994.
98. Reinvald, A. Keskkonnaseisundi reguleerimine majandusmeetoditega. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus 1992.
99. Reisman, M. Designing and Managing the Future of the State. – European Journal of International Law1997.
100. Relve, K. Definition of an Environmental Organisation in the Arhus Convention, Environmental Directives and Estonian Law. – Juridica International 2011, No 18.
101. Relve, K. Influence of Article 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention on Legal Standing in Estonian Administrative Court. – Juridica International 2009, No 16.
102. Relve, K. Standing of NGOs in Relation to Environmental Matters in Estonia. – Juridica International 2006, No 1.
103. Relve, K. Jäätmemõiste Euroopa Liidus ja Eestis: legaaldefinitsioonide ja kohtupraktika analüüs. – Juridica 2002, nr 8.
104. Riigikontrolli kontrolliaruanne nr OSIV-2-1.4/07/23 18.05.2007 – Keskkonnaseire korralduse tõhusus.
105. Riistop, M. Süsinikuringe metsas. – Eesti Mets 2002, nr 3.
106. Rückert, J. Vaba ja sotsiaalne – sajandi programm õigusele ja riigile. – Juridica 2003, nr 4.
107. Sadeleer, N. de. Environmental Principles. From Political Slogans to Legal Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
108. Sadeleer, N., Roller, G., Dross, M. Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. ENV.A.3/ETU/2002/0030 Final Report 2002.
109. Sandmo, A. Pigouvian taxes. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition 2008.
110. Sands, P. Principles of International Environmental Law, 2 edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003.
111. Sands, P. jt. Principles of International Environmental Law. Third edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.
112. Sands, P. Principles of International Environmental Law. Frameworks, Standards and Implementation. Manchester: Manchester University Press 1995.
113. Sands, P. Transnational Environmental Law: Lessons in Global Change. Kluwer Law International 1999.
114. Schmidtz, D., Willott, E. (toim). Environmental Ethics. What Really Matters, What Really Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
115. Siitam, N. Avalikkus avatud menetluses osalejana: Eesti ja Saksa haldusmenetluse seaduse võrdlev analüüs. – Juridica 2001, nr 5.
116. Skaerseth, J. North Sea Cooperation: Linking International and Domestic Pollution. Manchester University Press 2000.
117. Stoiber, C. jt. Handbook on Nuclear Law. International Atomic Energy Agency 2003. Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
118. Stirling, A. The Precautionary Principle in Science and Technology. O´Riordan, T., Cameron, J., Jordan, A. (toim). Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Cameron May 2001.
119. Taylor, P. W. Respect for Nature. A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1989.
120. Tenenbaum, E. A. World Park in Antarktrika: The Common Heritage of Mankind. – Virginia Environmental Law Journal 1999, Vol 10, p 109.
121. The Environmental Jurisprudence of the Europen Court of Justice. Bandi, G. (toim). Budapest 2008.
122. Truuväli, J. jt. Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadus. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. Tallinn: Juura 2003.
123. Turnbull, E. G. Trail Between Two Wars: The Story of a Smelter City. New York: Morriss Printing 1980.
124. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health, E/C. 12/2000/4 (2000).
125. UN Economic Comission for Europe. The Aarhus Convention: An implementation guide. Second Edition 2014. Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
126. Vaher, A., Keskpaik, R., Keerus, K. (koost). Keskkonnaeetika võtmetekste. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli eetikakeskus, Jakob von Uexkülli keskus 2008.
127. Varul, P. jt. Asjaõigusseadus I. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. Tallinn: Juura 2014.
128. Varul, P. jt. Võlaõigusseadus I. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. Tallinn: Juura 2006.
129. Veinla, H. Determination of the Level of Environmental Protection and the Proportionality of Environmental Measures in Community Law. – Juridica International 2004, No 1.
130. Veinla, H. Isikute keskkonnaalased põhikohustused: lähtekaalutlused ja sisustamine – Juridica 2012, nr 5.
131. Veinla, H. Kas meie looduse mitmekesisus ja väärtus võib olla takistuseks majanduse arengule? – Juridica 2009, nr 9.
132. Veinla, H. Precautionary Environmental Protection and Human Rights. – Juridica International 2007, No 1.
133. Veinla, H. Problems in Transposing the European Union’s Nature Conservation Directives into Estonian Law and Plans for Solving Them. – Juridica International 2011, No 1.
134. Veinla, H. Scope and Substance of the Integration Principle in EC Law and Its Application in Estonia. – Juridica International 2008, No 1.
135. Veinla, H. Sustainable Development as the Fundamental Principle of Europe’s Environmental Ius Commune. – Juridica International 2005, No 1.
136. Veinla, H. The Influence of European Union Law on the Conservation of Estonian Biological Diversity – the Case of Natura 2000 Areas. – Juridica International 2009, No 1.
137. Veinla, H. Determination of the Level of Environmental Protection and the Proportionality of Environmental Measures in Community Law. Veinla, H., Saunanen, E. Keskkonnaseadustiku üldosa seaduse eelnõu põhialused. – Juridica 2008, nr 9.
138. Veinla, H., Vahtrus, S. Operators’ General Obligations as an Environmental Duty of Care. – Juridica International 2013, No 1.
139. Weiss, E. B. Intergenerational equity: a legal framework for global environmental change. –Weiss, E. B. (toim). Environmental change and international law: New challenges and dimensions. Tokyo: United Nations University Press 1992.
140. Weiss, E. B. International Environmental Law: Contemporary Issues and the Emergence of a New World Order. – Georgetown Law Journal 1993, Vol 81.
141. White, R. Environmental Harm. An Eco-justice Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press at the University of Bristol 2013.
142. Winter, G. Environmental Principles in Community Law. Jans, J. H. (toim). The European Convention and the Future of European Environmental law. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing 2003.
143. Winter, G. The Legal Nature of Environmental Principles in International, EC and German Law. – Macrory, R. (toim). Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law. A High Level of Protection? Groningen: Europa Law Publishing 2006.
144. Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy. Effectiveness, Efficiency and Usage in Policy Mixes. OECD Library 2003.
145. Wurzel, R. The EU Presidency and the Integration Principle: an Anglo-German Comparison. – European Environmental Law Review, January 2001.
146. Ökomaksureform. Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
147. ÜRO kliimamuutuste paneeli raport Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report. Arvutivõrgus: [Link].
148. Yandle, B. Coase, Pigou, and Environmental Rights. Hills, P., Meiners, R. (toim). Who Owns the Environment. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers 1998.

Sisu lugemiseks peab teil olema kehtiv tellimus ning juurdepääsuks sisenege Smart-ID, Mobiil-ID või ID-kaardiga.

Registreeruge siin